Updated May 1st, 2006.Click here to see Archives
 
   J Parasitol. 2006 Feb;92(1):170-7.
Iron chelators: correlation between effects on Plasmodium spp. and immune functions.

Iron chelating agents, which permeate through erythrocytic and parasite membranes, are effective against Plasmodium falciparum in vitro. However, the protective effect in humans is transient. The authors examined the antiplasmodial capacity of several iron chelators in vitro and in vivo. The chelators 3/3hb/2m and 3/2hb/b (together, MoB) were more effective against P. falciparum in vitro than desferrioxamine (DFO) and Salicylaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone (SIH) (together, DoS). Despite similar pharmacokinetics of all iron chelators, mice infected with Plasmodium vinckei and treated with MoB succumbed to malaria, whereas DoS-treated mice survived. However, even in the surviving mice, peak parasitemias were above 30%. These results indicate that the direct effects of the drugs on the parasites were not responsible alone for the complete recovery of the mice. The authors suggest that the recovery is related to differential effects of the drugs on various immune functions. The authors concentrated on the effect of the iron chelators on B cell and T cell proliferation and on allogeneic stimulation (MLR), interleukin-10 (IL-10), gamma-interferon (gamma-IFN), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and radical production. All the iron chelators examined inhibited the in vitro proliferation of B cells and T cells, and MLR. This may explain why iron chelators are only slightly efficient in treating human malaria. However, the inhibitory effects of MoB on B cell and T cell proliferation and on MLR were more pronounced than those of DoS. In addition, the release of free radicals by effector cells was inhibited to a greater extent by MoB than by DoS. These results may explain why MoB, which was more efficient in vitro, was not effective in vivo. The DoS effects on the in vitro secretion of cytokines correlate with their in vivo effect; there was a decrease of IL-10 and a parallel increase in gamma-IFN and TNF-alpha production by human mononuclear cells. MoB, which could not rescue the animals from malaria, did not affect IL-10 and TNF-alpha, but reduced gamma-IFN levels. Identical results were obtained when using monocytes instead of mononuclear cells (except for gamma-IFN, which is not produced by monocytes). Our results indicate that an iron chelator, or any antiparasitic drug that kills the parasites in vitro, should also be selected for further evaluation on the basis of its reaction with immune components; it should not interfere with crucial protective immunological processes, but it may still alleviate parasitemia by positive immune modulation.

  download as PDF
 
  Int J Parasitol. 2006 May;36(5):583-93. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
Conventional and experimental treatment of cerebral malaria.

The most severe complication of Plasmodium falciparum infection is cerebral malaria (CM). Cerebral malaria implies the presence of neurological features, especially impaired consciousness. The treatment of CM is limited to: (i) a few conventional anti-malarial drugs (quinine or artemisinins), (ii) adjunctive treatments (initial stabilisation, blood exchange transfusion, osmotic diuretics and correction of hypoglycaemia, acidosis and hypovolaemia) and (iii) immunomodulation. There are clear procedures concerning treatment of CM, which include the use of the anti-plasmodial drugs. Adjunctive treatments are permissible but there is no single official guideline and immune intervention is a possibility currently being examined in rodent models only. The suggested immunomodulation approach is based on the strong likelihood that CM is the result of an immunopathological process. P. falciparum initiates the multifactorial chain of events leading to lethal CM and, after a certain stage, it is impossible to stop the progression even by using anti-malarial drugs. The authors present evidence that CM is a result of a dysregulated immune response. Therefore, it might be prevented by early modulation of discrete factors that participate in this process. In experimental systems, some immunomodulators delay or prevent CM without affecting the parasitaemia. Therefore, in the future the ultimate treatment of CM may be a combination of an anti-malarial and an immunomodulator. However, the overall effect of an immunomodulator would need to be carefully examined in view of concomitant infections, especially in malaria endemic areas.

  download as PDF
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supported by Ipca Laboratories Ltd.  Leaders in Antimalarials  
designed & developed by
Aniktantra